Last modified: 2015-10-25 by ian macdonald
Keywords: papua | territory of papua | blue ensign | canton (union flag) | disc (white) | crown: royal |
Links: FOTW homepage | search | disclaimer and copyright | write us | mirrors
1:2 image by Martin Grieve, 12 July 2008
The ensign was probably introduced for the special commissioner who was
appointed when the protectorate was proclaimed in 1884, and then taken over by
the administrator after the territory was annexed to the British crown in 1888.
It may have gone out of use in 1901 when British New Guinea was assigned to the
Commonwealth of Australia, or perhaps continued until 1906 when BNG became a
territory of the Commonwealth of Australia with the name Papua.
Martin Grieve, 12 July 2008
image by Martin Grieve, 12 July 2008
image by Ben Cahoon, 1 May 2012
In 1888, the letters were changed to "B.N.G" when it became a colonial
possession called British New Guinea, and the badge was used on blue and red
ensigns as well as with the wreath on the Governor's Union Flag, as standard
British practice. (source: Jilek)
Jonathan Dixon, 1 May 2012
I wrote, "The badge in this case consisted of a crown above the letters BNG,
although in 1906 correspondence from the Admiralty still referred to a badge
where the letters were simply "NG", which had been used before 1888."
The badge seems pretty clearly attached to the request for information for the revision of the Flag Book (page 37), which I think is referred to as an enclosure to the 19 Dec1905 letter. In either case, it seems that the relevant people at the Admiralty did not believe there had been a change. However, the memo for the Australian prime minister (page 16) states
that the letters on the badge were "B.N.G."
I was originally focussing on flags after 1906, so I haven't seen the correspondence that Jilek [jil89a] refers to as a basis for the change, so I don't know exactly what approval it had. It wasn't unusual for there to be a difference in view between Melbourne and London, and without knowing more, I'd say there several possible explanations in this case.
When it comes to what flags were actually being used by the BNG administration, it's interesting that after Capt. Collins, the Commonwealth representative in London, was contacted by Benjamin Edgington, a London flagmaker, regarding the 1906 badge, his description of the old badge was that it "had simply B.N.G. in block letters", with no reference to a crown. (NAA A1 1907/7915 digital link, http://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/scripts/Imagine.asp?B=8452, p3).
Jonathan Dixon, 7 May 2012
The image of the badge with a crown and the letters N.G. appears to be
sourced from the 1889 edition of the British Admiralty flag book [hms89]. It is
possible that the publication date for this book could have been too close to
the change in status of British New Guinea to reflect the change in the name
from "New Guinea" to "British New Guinea", which seems to have occurred in 1884
with the British annexation.
Stanley Gibbons stamp catalogue has a note that states that Queensland stamps were used in the territory with postmarks that used N.G. in Port Moresby from 1885 and B.N.G. from 1888 at other post offices. The first issue of local stamps occurred from 1 July 1901 and bore the name British New Guinea until 1906. However, Frederick Hulme's "The Flags of the World" at page 84, published in 1897 [hul97], states: "New Guinea ... has the crown, and beneath it the letters N.G."
Other than Jonathan's ICV paper, and its use on worldstatesmen.org there seems to be no source for the B.N.G. badge other than the ICV12 lecture by Dr. Wolfgang Jilek; "Symbols in New Guinea - Tribal, Colonial, National , and Provincial" [jiL89a]. Most of Dr Jilek's excellent paper focused on the tribal vexilloids and modern provincial flags and he gave only a brief discussion on the pre-independence flags associated with British New Guinea. He states: "In 1888 the status was changed from protected territory to colonial possession under the name British New Guinea. Consequently, the letters on the ensign badge were changed to B.N.G." Dr Jilek identifies his source in a footnote as "Correspondence and illustrations in the Flag Research Center archives." The Congress proceedings version of his lecture does not contain any illustrations relating to any of the British colonial flags.
I also note that the description of the New Guinea badge in the Australian Archives includes the inscription "Special Commissioner for Protected Territory of New Guinea", which was the pre-annexation description of the Territory.
On balance, I am inclined to the opinion that the B.N.G badge probably did exist, though there is some doubt, as the various sources are highly suggestive that the N.G. badge was not replaced until the PAPUA badge came into use.
Ralph Kelly, 7 May 2012
It seems to me that any of the sources suggesting that NG badge wasn't
replaced are relying on the Admiralty Flag Book, and so we wouldn't expect to
see any flag that for whatever reason did not make it there. On the other hand,
the Department of External Affairs minute referring to the BNG badge came a few
months after the enquiry from Mr. Edgington, so at this point I can't be sure
that there is any source confirming the BNG version independent of a flagmaker
Jonathan Dixon, 7 May 2012
I am now convinced that the B N G badge existed. Three separate contemporary
references to B N G are pretty convincing proof. The discrepancy appears to have
arisen from a failure to record the change in the 1889 Admiralty Flag Book. A
copy in the National Maritime Museum Library has the complete set of fifteen
amendments, but still shows the original N G badge for New Guinea. A flag chart
published by James Brown in about 1906 has the badge for Transvaal, which was a
1904 Flag Book amendment, but still has N G for “Sp. Commissioner for Protected
Territory of New Guinea”.
David Prothero, 7 May 2012